Grammatical category as unity of meaning. The notion of opposition.

Grammatical categories.

Grammatical categories are made up by the unity of identical grammatical meanings that have the same form (e.g. singular::plural). Due to dialectal unity of language and thought, grammatical categories correlate, on the one hand, with the conceptual categories and, on the other hand, with the objective reality. It may be shown with the help of a triangle model:

It follows that we may define grammatical categories as references of the corresponding objective categories. For example, the objective category of time finds its representation in the grammatical category of tense, the objective category of quantityfinds its representation in the grammatical category of number. Those grammatical categories that have references in the objective reality are called referentialgrammatical categories. However, not all of the grammatical categories have references in the objective reality, just a few of them do not correspond to anything in the objective reality. Such categories correlate only with conceptual matters:

They are called significationalcategories. To this type belong the categories of mood and degree. Speaking about the grammatical category of mood we can say that it has modality as its conceptual correlate. It can be explained by the fact that it does not refer to anything in the objective reality – it expresses the speaker’s attitude to what he says.

4. The notion of opposition.

Any grammatical category must be represented by at least two grammatical forms (e.g. the grammatical category of number – singular and plural forms). The relation between two grammatical forms differing in meaning and external signs is called opposition –book::books (unmarked member/marked member). All grammatical categories find their realization through oppositions, e.g. the grammatical category of number is realized through the opposition singular::plural.

Taking all the above mentioned into consideration, we may define the grammatical category as the opposition between two mutually exclusive form-classes (a form-class is a set of words with the same explicit grammatical meaning).

Meansof realization of grammatical categories may be synthetic (near – nearer) and analytic (beautiful – more beautiful).

Analytical and synthetic formations.

Types of morphemes.

Morphemes can be classified from different view-points:

1. functional

2. number correlation between form and content

From the point of view of function they may be lexical and grammatical. The lexical morphemes

are those that express full lexical meaning of their own and are associated with some object, quality,

action, number of reality, like: lip, red, go, one and so on. The lexical morphemes can be subdivided into

lexical - free and lexical - bound morphemes. The examples given above are free ones; they are used in

speech independently. The lexical-bound ones are never used independently; they are usually added to

some lexical-free morphemes to build new words like- friend-ship, free-dom, teach-er, spoon-ful and so

on. Taking into account that in form they resemble the grammatical inflections they may be also called

lexical - grammatical morphemes. Thus lexical - bound morphemes are those that determine lexical

meanings of words but resemble grammatical morphemes in their dependence on lexical - free

morphemes. The lexical - bound morphemes are means to build new words.

The grammatical morphemes are those that are used either to connect words in sentences or to

form new grammatical forms of words. The content of such morphemes are connected with the world of

reality only indirectly therefore they are also called structural morphemes, e.g., shall, will, be, have, is, -

(e)s, -(e)d and so on. As it is seen from the examples the grammatical morphemes have also two

subtypes: grammatical - free and grammatical - bound. The grammatical - free ones are used in sentences

independently (I shall go) while grammatical - bound ones are usually attached to some lexical - free

morphemes to express new grammatical form, like: girl's bag, bigger room, asked.

From the point of view of number correlation between form and content there may be overt, zero,

empty and discontinuous morphemes.

By overt morpheme the linguists understand morphemes that are represented by both form and

content like: eye, bell, big and so on.

Zero morphemes are those that have (meaning) content but do not have explicitly expressed

forms. These morphemes are revealed by means of comparison:

ask – asks

high -higher

In these words the second forms are marked: "asks" is a verb in the third person singular which is

expressed by the inflection "s". In its counterpart there's no marker like "s" but the absence of the marker

also has grammatical meaning: it means that the verb "ask" is not in the third person, singular number.

Such morphemes are called "zero". In the second example the adjective "higher" is in the comparative

degree, because of the "- er" while its counterpart "high" is in the positive degree, the absence of the

marker expresses a grammatical meaning, i.e. a zero marker is also meaningful, therefore it's a zero

morpheme.

There are cases when there's a marker which has not a concrete meaning, i.e. there's neither

lexical nor grammatical meaning like: statesman. The word consists of three morphemes: state - s - man.

The first and third morphemes have certain meanings. But "s" has no meaning though serve as a

connector: it links the first morpheme with the third one. Such morphemes are called empty. Thus empty

morphemes are those that have form but no content.

In contemporary English there are cases when two forms express one meaning like:

He is writing a letter

Two morphemes in this sentence "is" and " - ing" express one meaning: a continuous action.

Such morphemes are called discontinuous.

Thus there are two approaches to classify morphemes: functional and number correlation between form and

content.

Не нашли, что искали? Воспользуйтесь поиском по сайту: